Chart only MSP text only

“When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do sir?” – John Maynard Keynes

 

The UK has big problem with the false positive rate (FPR) of its Covid-19 tests. The authorities acknowledge no FPR, so positive test results are not corrected for false positives and that is a big problem.

 

The standard Covid-19 RT-PCR test results have a consistent positive rate of ≤ 2% which also appears to be the likely false positive rate (FPR), rendering the number of official ‘cases’ virtually meaningless. The likely low virus prevalence (~0.02%) is consistent with as few as 1% of the 6,100+ Brits now testing positive each week in the wider community (pillar 2) tests actually have the disease.

 

We are now asked to believe that a random, probably asymptomatic member of the public is 5x more likely to test ‘positive’ than someone tested in hospital, which seems preposterous given that ~40% of diagnosed infections originated in hospitals.

 

The high amplification of PCR tests requires them to be subject to black box software algorithms, which the numbers suggest are preset at a 2% positive rate. If so, we will never get ‘cases’ down until and unless we reduce, or better yet cease altogether, randomized testing. Instead the government plans to ramp them up to 10m a day at a cost of £100bn, equivalent to the entire NHS budget.

 

Government interventions have seriously negative political, economic and health implications yet are entirely predicated on test results that are almost entirely false. Despite the prevalence of virus in the UK having fallen to about 2-in-10,000, the chances of testing ‘positive’ stubbornly remain ~100x higher than that.

Radical uncertainty & govt. innumeracy

To continue reading, please contact Andy Lees

Are you positive you are ‘positive’?

Radical uncertainty screenshot

11 December 2020

 

Click to download full report